Overview:

Project 2025 and Agenda 47’s aggressive and hostile approach to immigration, combined with their disregard for Mexican sovereignty, threatens to poison the U.S.-Mexico relationship, with devastating consequences for both nations.

Key Takeaways:

  • Xenophobia and Scapegoating: The agenda demonizes Mexico and Mexican immigrants, portraying them as criminals and threats to American security, fueling xenophobia and undermining the foundation of a healthy relationship.
  • Border Militarization: The obsession with border security, including the construction of a wall and the deployment of more agents and technology, creates a militarized zone that symbolizes hostility and distrust.
  • Disregard for Mexican Sovereignty: Project 2025 and Agenda 47 advocate for policies that disregard Mexican sovereignty, seeking to impose U.S. will on Mexico through pressure, coercion, and even potential intervention.
  • Economic Warfare: The project’s protectionist trade policies, particularly those targeting China, could indirectly harm Mexico’s economy, which is deeply integrated into North American supply chains.
  • Undermining Cooperation: The aggressive approach to immigration and disregard for Mexican interests would undermine cooperation on shared challenges like drug trafficking, organized crime, climate change, and economic development.

Critical Quote:

“We will build a big, beautiful wall and make Mexico pay for it.” (Donald Trump)

Why It Matters:

A healthy U.S.-Mexico relationship is essential for the prosperity and security of both nations. Project 2025’s agenda threatens to turn a vital partnership into a toxic rivalry, with far-reaching consequences for regional stability, economic growth, and the well-being of communities on both sides of the border.

Red Flags:

  • Mass Deportations: Sending millions of undocumented immigrants back to Mexico, overwhelming its resources and fueling anti-American sentiment.
  • Ending Birthright Citizenship: Stripping U.S.-born children of Mexican parents of their citizenship, creating a legal and humanitarian crisis.
  • “Remain in Mexico” Policy: Forcing asylum seekers to wait in dangerous conditions in Mexico while their cases are processed in the U.S.
  • Economic Pressure and Potential Intervention: Using tariffs, sanctions, and even threats of military intervention to coerce Mexico into complying with U.S. demands.

Bottom Line:

Project 2025 and Agenda 47’s approach to Mexico is dangerous and destructive. It would poison the relationship, undermine cooperation, and harm both countries. We must advocate for a more respectful, collaborative, and mutually beneficial partnership that addresses shared challenges and recognizes the interconnectedness of our two nations.